ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024
Demographic comparison of subjects in FDA approval trials in the United States to disorder specific demographics using Real World Data.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) for Analgesics: Review of Applications, Regulatory Integration, and Emerging Directions.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Outcomes of a Comprehensive Mobile Vaping Cessation Program in Adults Who Vape Daily: Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended that clinical trial study populations accurately reflect the patients likely to use the product, if approved. The FDA has not provided specific guidance on how cohort sizes of clinically relevant demographic characteristics should be determined. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare demographic characteristics reported in US-only FDA approval trials to the demographic characteristics of the related medical disorders in an electronic health records database of >150 M patients in the United States (US). The results demonstrate that comparative disparities in demographic cohort proportions are common, yet inconsistent, and highlight the need to define disorder specific demographic cohort proportion goals in future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.