ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2024
Validity of the Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Some upper-limb function assessments can evaluate treatments in the non-ambulatory stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities (FCUE) was developed for DMD in Japan. The FCUE is easier to use than the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) and is more detailed than the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of FCUE with other methods of assessment for DMD. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 39 boys with DMD from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry to evaluate the concurrent validity of the FCUE and PUL using non-parametric Spearman rank correlation (ρ). We also determined the concurrent validity of the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale and PUL for comparison. Results: The ρ value between the FCUE and PUL was -0.914 (P<0.001). The FCUE showed robust concurrent validity with the PUL. That correlation between the FCUE and Brooke Upper Extremity Scale gave a ρ value of -0.854 (P<0.001). Conclusions: The FCUE had a higher concurrent validity with the PUL than with the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. The FCUE is considered a valid assessment tool of upper-limb function in boys with DMD. Selecting the best assessment method depends on the severity of the patient's condition and a balance between assessment accuracy and evaluation time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.