Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38665771›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Paired metagenomic and chemical evaluation of aflatoxin-contaminated dog kibble.

Andrea Ottesen, Brandon Kocurek, Elizabeth Reed, Seth Commichaux, Mark Mammel, Padmini Ramachandran, Patrick McDermott, Brenna M Flannery, Errol Strain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea OttesenCenter for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, United States.
Brandon KocurekCenter for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, United States.
Elizabeth ReedCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
Seth CommichauxCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
Mark MammelCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
Padmini RamachandranCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
Patrick McDermottCenter for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, United States.
Brenna M FlanneryCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
Errol StrainCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USCenter for Veterinary Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Identification of chemical toxins from complex or highly processed foods can present 'needle in the haystack' challenges for chemists. Metagenomic data can be used to guide chemical toxicity evaluations by providing DNA-based description of the wholistic composition (eukaryotic, bacterial, protozoal, viral, and antimicrobial resistance) of foods suspected to harbor toxins, allergens, or pathogens. This type of information can focus chemistry-based diagnostics, improve hazard characterization and risk assessment, and address data gaps. Additionally, there is increasing recognition that simultaneously co-occurring mycotoxins, either from single or multiple species, can impact dietary toxicity exposure. Metagenomic data provides a way to address data gaps related to co-occurrence of multiple fungal species. Methods: Paired metagenomic and chemical data were used to evaluate aflatoxin-contaminated kibble with known levels of specific mycotoxins. Kibble was ground to a fine powder for both chemical and molecular analyses. Chemical analyses were performed with Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS) and according to the AOAC Official method 2005.08: Aflatoxins in Corn, Raw Peanuts, and Peanut Butter using Liquid Chromatography with Post-Column Photochemical Derivatization. Metagenomes were created from DNA extracted from ground kibble and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 2000 with an average sequence depth of 180 million reads per replicate. Results and discussion: Metagenomic data demonstrated that the abundance of DNA from putative aflatoxigenic Aspergillus spp. correlated with the levels of aflatoxin quantified by LCMS. Metagenomic data also identified an expansive range of co-occurring fungal taxa which may produce additional mycotoxins. DNA data paired with chemical data provides a novel modality to address current data gaps surrounding dietary mycotoxin exposure, toxigenic fungal taxonomy, and mycotoxins of emerging concern.

Indexed as

aflatoxinAspergilluschemicalkibblemetagenomemetagenomic

Identifiers

PMID38665771
PMCPMC11043538
OpenAlexW4394723265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.