ArticleCureus2024
A Biomechanical Study of Calcaneal Tuberosity Avulsion Fracture: A Comparison Between Three-Screw Versus Two-Screw Fixation Strength.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical case analysis and finite element analysis of Beavis type II avulsion fractures of the calcaneal tuberosity.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Changes in serum NO, ET-1, and VEGF after cannulated screw fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures and their relationship with femoral head necrosis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture constitutes a sub-group of calcaneal fractures and it poses a high risk of soft tissue compromise, necessitating urgent reduction and fixation. This fracture was commonly treated with screw fixation, and fixation failure associated with this method has been reported in the literature. In light of this, we tested and compared the strength of two-screw (2S) versus three-screw (3S) fixations, where the third screw was fixed from the posterior calcaneal tuberosity towards the anterior process in addition to the two parallel screws. Synthetic calcaneum models were tested with an Instron machine to measure the maximum tensile load and stiffness. The mean maximum tensile loads for 3S and 2S were 455.8 N (SD = 47.4) and 341.0 N (SD = 30.9), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The mean stiffnesses for 3S and 2S were 29.2 N/mm (SD = 1.8) and 29.7 N/mm (SD = 2.0), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Based on our findings, the added third screw increased the pull-out strength and can be inserted percutaneously to minimize soft tissue compromise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.