Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38665704›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Optimization of Polycaprolactone and Type I Collagen Scaffold for Tendon Tissue Regeneration.

Craig Cady, Kalyani Nair, Hugo C Rodriguez, Brandon Rust, Samir Ghandour, Anish Potty, Ashim Gupta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Craig CadyBiology, Bradley University, Peoria, USA.
Kalyani NairMechanical Engineering, Bradley University, Peoria, USA.
Hugo C RodriguezOrthopedic Surgery, Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, USA.
Brandon RustMedicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Samir GhandourRadiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Anish PottyOrthopedics, South Texas Orthopaedic Research Institute, Laredo, USA.
Ashim GuptaRegenerative Medicine, Future Biologics, Lawrenceville, USA.
Bradley University · USLaredo Community College · USLarkin Community Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Collagen synthesis is vital for restoring musculoskeletal tissues, particularly in tendon and ligamentous structures. Tissue engineering utilizes scaffolds for cell adhesion and differentiation. Although synthetic scaffolds offer initial strength, their long-term stability is surpassed by biological scaffolds. Combining polycaprolactone (PCL) toughness with collagen in scaffold design, this study refines fabrication via electrospinning, aiming to deliver enduring biomimetic matrices for widespread applications in musculoskeletal repair. Methods Electrospinning employed four solutions with varied collagen and PCL concentrations, dissolved in chloroform, methanol, and hexafluoro-2-propanol. Solutions were combined to yield 60 mg/mL concentrations with different collagen/PCL ratios. Electrospinning at 12-14kV voltage produced scaffolds, followed by vacuum-drying. Collagen coating was applied to PCL and 15% collagen/PCL scaffolds using a 0.1% collagen solution. SEM characterized fiber morphology, tensile testing was conducted to determine the mechanical properties of the scaffold, and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analyzed scaffold composition. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analyzed the stiffness properties of individual fibers, and a finite element model was developed to predict the mechanical properties. Cell culture involved seeding human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells onto scaffolds, which were assessed through Alamar Blue assay and confocal imaging. Results Various scaffolds (100% PCL, PCL-15% collagen, PCL-25% collagen, PCL-35% collagen) were fabricated to emulate the extracellular matrix, revealing collagen's impact on fiber diameter reduction with increasing concentration. Tensile testing highlighted collagen's initial enhancement of mechanical strength, followed by a decline beyond PCL-15% collagen. FTIR spectroscopy detected potential hydrogen bonding between collagen and PCL. A finite element model predicted scaffold response to external forces which was validated by the tensile test data. Cell viability and proliferation assays demonstrated successful plating on all scaffolds, with optimal proliferation observed in PCL-25% collagen. Confocal imaging confirmed stem cell integration into the three-dimensional material. Collagen coating preserved nanofiber morphology, with no significant changes in diameter. Coating of collagen significantly altered the tensile strength of the scaffolds at the macro scale. AFM highlighted stiffness differences between PCL and collagen-coated PCL mats at the single fiber scale. The coating process did not significantly enhance initial cell attachment but promoted increased proliferation on collagen-coated PCL scaffolds. Conclusion The study reveals collagen-induced mechanical and morphological alterations, influencing fiber alignment, diameter, and chemical composition while emphasizing scaffolds' vital role in providing a controlled niche for stem cell proliferation and differentiation. The optimization of each of these scaffold characteristics and subsequent finite element modeling can lead to highly repeatable and ideal scaffold properties for stem cell integration and proliferation.

Indexed as

biomaterialscollagenelectrospinningmusculoskeletal injuriespolycaprolactoneregenerative medicinescaffoldstendonstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38665704
PMCPMC11044072
OpenAlexW4393196347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.