ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Perspectives on systematic capacity building in pharmaceutical regulation for regulators of medical products.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory Convergence in Cell and Gene Therapy: Harmonizing Quality, CMC, and Approval Pathways Across the FDA, EMA, PMDA, and Emerging Markets.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Competencies for health technology assessment professionals: a scoping review and content analysis.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- Making Advanced Therapies Affordable and Accessible: Two Strategic Approaches.Developing world bioethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Having a robust, integrated regulatory system is important for ensuring the availability of safe and efficacious medical products of good quality and for protecting public health. However, less than 30% of countries globally have reached the required regulatory maturity level three, with low- and middle-income countries facing challenges in attracting and retaining qualified staff. World Health Organization (WHO) advocates for systematic workforce development, including competency-based education, to address these gaps. We provide perspectives on a systematic approach to capacity building of medicine regulators based on the experience and lessons learnt in developing and piloting the WHO global competency framework for medicine regulators through three scenarios. A systematic approach to capacity building, such as the human performance technology model, can be used to implement the WHO competency framework as part of organizational performance improvement while ensuring that initiatives are well-defined, targeted, and aligned with organizational goals. The competency framework can be used in different contexts, such as improving organization performance for individual regulatory authorities, strengthening regional collaborations, harmonization and reliance on medical products assessment and joint good manufacturing practices inspections of pharmaceutical manufacturers, and developing learning programs for medicine regulators. A competency-based learning approach for regulatory professionals ensures the transfer of learning to the workplace by integrating real-world practices in learning activities and assessments. Further work is required to develop and validate the assessment instruments, apply the competency framework in other contexts, expanding the learning programmes while continuously providing feedback for further refinement of the competency framework and implementation support tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.