Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38665250›Full record

ArticleBMJ neurology open2024

Long-term follow-up study of SWEDD patients with mild parkinsonian signs.

Shoichi Sasaki

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ neurology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Analyzing the 'Bradykinesia Complex' in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shoichi SasakiNeurology, Agano City Hospital, Agano, Niigata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-0547
Toranomon Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whether scan without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) can be a reliable indication of a clinical entity of Parkinson's disease (PD) is controversial. Objective: To evaluate the proportion of SWEDD patients with mild parkinsonian signs who are classifiable as idiopathic PD. Methods: 32 SWEDD patients with unilateral or asymmetric finger tremor with a rest component and unilateral rigidity (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III scores of 3-5) were enrolled. They underwent longitudinal examination by UPDRS-III, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), smell test and Results: At follow-up, 21 of 32 SWEDD patients (65.6%) showed significantly reduced specific binding ratios below the normal range, that is, positive DaTSCAN, sometimes with increased asymmetry index (n=11). Among these 21 patients, the mean (SD) UPDRS-III score at follow-up was significantly higher than that at baseline (5.5 (2.2) vs 4.0 (0.5)) (p=0.003). The mean (SD) MMSE scores in SWEDD patients (n=32) at baseline and follow-up were not significantly different compared with those in controls. Olfactory function both in SWEDD patients with positive and negative DaTSCAN was significantly impaired versus controls (p<0.001), although no significant difference was recognised between patients with positive (n=21) and negative (n=11) second DaTSCAN. Conclusion: The majority of SWEDD patients with mild rest tremor and rigidity could be classified as having idiopathic PD in this longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.

Indexed as

clinical neurologyneuroradiologyparkinson's diseasespect

Identifiers

PMID38665250
PMCPMC11043762
OpenAlexW4395479332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.