ArticleCommunications psychology2023
Processing load, and not stimulus evidence, determines the duration of unconscious visual feature integration.
Article in Communications psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential neural dynamics underlie unconscious integration and conscious perception of visual stimuli.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Regularities in temporal context influence the window of temporal integration.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Continuous temporal integration in the human visual system.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Investigating the relationship between subjective perception and unconscious feature integration.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Temporal windows of unconscious processing cannot easily be disrupted.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Processing load, and not stimulus evidence, determines the duration of unconscious visual feature integration.Communications psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integration across space and time is essential for the analysis of motion, low contrast, and many more stimuli. A crucial question is what determines the duration of integration. Based on classical models of decision-making, one might expect that integration terminates as soon as sufficient evidence about a stimulus is accumulated and a threshold is crossed. However, there is very little research on this question as most experimental paradigms cannot monitor processing following stimulus presentation. In particular, it is difficult to determine when processing terminates. Here, using the sequential metacontrast paradigm (SQM), in which information is mandatorily integrated along motion trajectories, we show that the processing load determines the extent of integration but that evidence accumulation does not. Further, the extent of integration is determined by absolute time instead of the number of elements presented. These results have important implications for understanding the time course and mechanisms of temporal integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.