ArticleNpj viruses2023
An HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody overcomes structural and dynamic variation through highly focused epitope targeting.
Article in Npj viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Germline-somatic residue synergy reshapes antibody encounter-state pathways to enhance HIV-1 recognition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A modification to heptad repeat 1 of gp41 improves yield and/or quality of soluble pre-fusion HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimers.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Structural development of the HIV-1 apex-directed PGT145-PGDM1400 antibody lineage.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Unleashing virus structural biology: Probing protein and membrane intermediates in the dynamic process of membrane fusion.QRB discovery · 2025Review
- Assessing bnAb potency in the context of HIV-1 envelope conformational plasticity.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- A library-on-library screen reveals the breadth expansion landscape of a broadly neutralizing betacoronavirus antibody.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The existence of broadly cross-reactive antibodies that can neutralize diverse HIV-1 isolates (bnAbs) has been appreciated for more than a decade. Many high-resolution structures of bnAbs, typically with one or two well-characterized HIV-1 Env glycoprotein trimers, have been reported. However, an understanding of how such antibodies grapple with variability in their antigenic targets across diverse viral isolates has remained elusive. To achieve such an understanding requires first characterizing the extent of structural and antigenic variation embodied in Env, and then identifying how a bnAb overcomes that variation at a structural level. Here, using hydrogen/deuterium-exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) and quantitative measurements of antibody binding kinetics, we show that variation in structural ordering in the V1/V2 apex of Env across a globally representative panel of HIV-1 isolates has a marked effect on antibody association rates and affinities. We also report cryo-EM reconstructions of the apex-targeting PGT145 bnAb bound to two divergent Env that exhibit different degrees of structural dynamics throughout the trimer structures. Parallel HDX-MS experiments demonstrate that PGT145 bnAb has an exquisitely focused footprint at the trimer apex where binding did not yield allosteric changes throughout the rest of the structure. These results demonstrate that structural dynamics are a cryptic determinant of antigenicity, and mature antibodies that have achieved breadth and potency in some cases are able to achieve their broad cross-reactivity by "threading the needle" and binding in a highly focused fashion, thus evading and overcoming the variable properties found in Env from divergent isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.