ArticleData in brief2024
High-throughput metagenomic assessment of Cango Cave microbiome-A South African limestone cave.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete genome sequence data forData in brief · 2026Article
- Reconstruction of 1,979 prokaryotic metagenome-assembled genomes from 37 global cave environments.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Comparison of Culture-Dependent and Culture-Independent Methods for Routine Identification of Airborne Microorganisms in Speleotherapeutic Caves.Microorganisms · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms inhabiting caves exhibit medical or biotechnological promise, most of which have been attributed to factors such as antimicrobial activity or the induction of mineral precipitation. This dataset explored the shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the Cango cave microbial community in Oudtshoorn, South Africa. The aimed to elucidate both the structure and function of the microbial community linked to the cave. DNA sequencing was conducted using the Illumina NovaSeq platform, a next-generation sequencing. The data comprises 4,738,604 sequences, with a cumulative size of 1,180,744,252 base pairs and a GC content of 52%. Data derived from the metagenome sequences can be accessed through the bioproject number PRJNA982691 on NCBI. Using an online metagenome server, MG-RAST, the subsystem database revealed that bacteria displayed the highest taxonomical representation, constituting about 98.66%. Archaea accounted for 0.05%, Eukaryotes at 1.20%, viruses were 0.07%, while unclassified sequences had a representation of 0.02%. The most abundant phyla were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.