Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38665142›Full record

ArticlePsychoradiology2022

A systematic analysis of diagnostic performance for Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI.

Jiangping Wu, Kun Zhao, Zhuangzhuang Li, Dong Wang, Yanhui Ding, Yongbin Wei, Han Zhang, Yong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiangping WuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China.
Kun ZhaoBeijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-100X
Zhuangzhuang LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China.
Dong WangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan, 250014, China.
Yanhui DingSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan, 250014, China.
Yongbin WeiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China.
Han ZhangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China.
Yong LiuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-3121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders in the elderly. Although numerous structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) studies have reported diagnostic models that could distinguish AD from normal controls (NCs) with 80-95% accuracy, limited efforts have been made regarding the clinically practical computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for AD. Objective: To explore the potential factors that hinder the clinical translation of the AD-related diagnostic models based on sMRI. Methods: To systematically review the diagnostic models for AD based on sMRI, we identified relevant studies published in the past 15 years on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid. To evaluate the heterogeneity and publication bias among those studies, we performed subgroup analysis, meta-regression, Begg's test, and Egger's test. Results: According to our screening criterion, 101 studies were included. Our results demonstrated that high diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing AD from NC was obtained in recently published studies, accompanied by significant heterogeneity. Meta-analysis showed that many factors contributed to the heterogeneity of high diagnostic accuracy of AD using sMRI, which included but was not limited to the following aspects: (i) different datasets; (ii) different machine learning models, e.g. traditional machine learning or deep learning model; (iii) different cross-validation methods, e.g. Conclusions: Our findings proved that previous studies reported promising results for classifying AD from NC with different models using sMRI. However, considering the many factors hindering clinical radiology practice, there would still be a long way to go to improve.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasediagnosisheterogeneitymeta-analysissMRI

Identifiers

PMID38665142
PMCPMC10939341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.