ArticlePsychoradiology2022
A systematic analysis of diagnostic performance for Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI.
Article in Psychoradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Functional MRI-specific alterations in frontoparietal network in mild cognitive impairment: an ALE meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis Using PET-MRI: A Narrative Review of High-Impact Literature Post-Tauvid Approval.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Integration of Neuroimaging and Molecular Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia: The Promise of fMRI.Current Alzheimer research · 2025Review
- A neuroimaging biomarker for Individual Brain-Related Abnormalities In Neurodegeneration (IBRAIN): a cross-sectional study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders in the elderly. Although numerous structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) studies have reported diagnostic models that could distinguish AD from normal controls (NCs) with 80-95% accuracy, limited efforts have been made regarding the clinically practical computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for AD. Objective: To explore the potential factors that hinder the clinical translation of the AD-related diagnostic models based on sMRI. Methods: To systematically review the diagnostic models for AD based on sMRI, we identified relevant studies published in the past 15 years on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid. To evaluate the heterogeneity and publication bias among those studies, we performed subgroup analysis, meta-regression, Begg's test, and Egger's test. Results: According to our screening criterion, 101 studies were included. Our results demonstrated that high diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing AD from NC was obtained in recently published studies, accompanied by significant heterogeneity. Meta-analysis showed that many factors contributed to the heterogeneity of high diagnostic accuracy of AD using sMRI, which included but was not limited to the following aspects: (i) different datasets; (ii) different machine learning models, e.g. traditional machine learning or deep learning model; (iii) different cross-validation methods, e.g. Conclusions: Our findings proved that previous studies reported promising results for classifying AD from NC with different models using sMRI. However, considering the many factors hindering clinical radiology practice, there would still be a long way to go to improve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.