Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38664990›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2024

Unpaid carers of people with dementia and information communication technology: Use, impact and ideas for the future.

Jacqueline Damant, Paul Freddolino, Margaret Dangoor, Bo Hu, Derek King, Raphael Wittenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacqueline DamantCare Policy and Evaluation Centre of the London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1425-272X
Paul FreddolinoSchool of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; LSE, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-7085
Margaret DangoorCare Policy and Evaluation Centre of the London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8146-279X
Bo HuCare Policy and Evaluation Centre of the London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5256-505X
Derek KingCare Policy and Evaluation Centre of the London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2408-4558
Raphael WittenbergCare Policy and Evaluation Centre of the London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3096-2721
London School of Economics and Political Science · GBLaser Scan Engineering (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSeveral 100,000s of people living with dementia in the UK are cared for at home by a spouse or relative. Few studies have considered the ICT needs and experiences of unpaid carers. This study explores the types of ICT unpaid carers use, the ways they use ICT, the impact of ICT-use, and their ideas for how ICT could be more supportive of their role as a carer.

methodsSix focus groups with 32 unpaid carers of people living with dementia discussed their experiences of - and barriers to - using ICT. Transcripts were analysed thematically according to three types of ICT (mainstream, accessible and formal) and five functions (supporting domestic tasks, care management, monitoring, communication and information and education).

resultsParticipants predominantly used mainstream ICT devices such as laptops and smartphones and internet-enabled applications including videoconferencing and social media platforms to support their daily activities and assist them in their caring role. A few participants discussed using accessible devices such as memory clocks and formal telecare and care-phone services for care management and monitoring functions. Participants' ideas for improvements centred on personalised communication applications that facilitate remote interactions and promote persons living with dementia's independence. Others expressed concerns about the growing need to use ICT to access formal care services and the inadequacy of the ICT infrastructure in some care homes.

conclusionsUnpaid carers mostly turn to readily available mainstream ICT to support their personal and care activities. Further research is required to understand the social impact of the increasing reliance of ICT across health, social and residential care service sectors. Improved cooperation between unpaid carers, technology developers and care services providers could align ICT development to the needs and experiences of families living with dementia and assist unpaid carers with identifying ICTs that optimally support their personal circumstances.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaFocus GroupsAdultAgedCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdomfocus groupimpactpeople living with dementiatechnologyunpaid carers

Identifiers

PMID38664990
PMCPMC11163843
OpenAlexW4395669190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.