Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38664853›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2024

Predictors of contraceptive discontinuation in Rwanda: evidence from demographic and health survey 2019-2020.

Harerimana Jean de Dieu, Mugabo Lambert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harerimana Jean de DieuD-Hause Co, Kigali, Rwanda. harerimanajado85@gmail.com.
Mugabo Lambert, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite advancements, Rwanda continues to face challenges regarding contraceptive discontinuation. The 2019-2020 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) reported a 30% discontinuation rate among women within the first year of use. This study analyses predictors of discontinuation using this DHS data, with the goal of strengthening Rwanda's family planning programs.

methodsData from the 2019-20 Rwanda DHS (14,634 women aged 15-49) was examined. A two-stage sampling design informed the survey. Life table methods and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze discontinuation rates, median usage duration across contraceptive methods, and the influence of demographic and other factors.

resultsResults indicated a progressive rise in contraceptive discontinuation over different period: 16.69% at 6 months, 29.29% at 12 months, and 47.21% at 24 months. Pills and male condoms showed higher discontinuation probabilities early on. While injectables and LAM initially showed lower discontinuation, rates rose significantly by the 24th month. Health concerns and side effects were the primary reasons cited for discontinuation. The Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed significant factors influencing discontinuation: contraceptive method, desire for pregnancy, husband's disapproval, access/availability, and the desire for a more effective method.

conclusionThis study highlights substantial contraceptive discontinuation rates in Rwanda, particularly for pills and injectables. Method type, health concerns, side effects, and method failure were associated with discontinuation. Interventions should focus on improving contraceptive continuation and investigating alternative methods with lower discontinuation tendencies.

Indexed as

Contraceptive discontinuationDiscontinuation ratesFamily planningHealth concernsLife table methodsSide effects

Identifiers

PMID38664853
PMCPMC11044445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.