ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
MRCT and CT in the diagnosis of pediatric disease imaging: assessing imaging performance and clinical effects.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on heterogeneity of vascularity and cellularity via multiparametric MRI habitat imaging in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study focused on analyzing the clinical value and effect of magnetic resonance imaging plus computed tomography (MRCT) and CT in the clinical diagnosis of cerebral palsy in children.
methodsFrom February 2021 to April 2023, 94 children diagnosed with cerebral palsy were selected from our hospital for study subjects. These patients were divided into CT and MRI groups, with CT examination given to the CT group and MRI examination given to the MRI group. The positive rate of the two examination methods in the diagnosis of cerebral palsy was compared, different imaging signs in two groups of children with cerebral palsy were compared, and the diagnostic test typing results between two groups were further analyzed.
resultsThe diagnostic positivity rate of the children in the MRI group was 91.49%, which was significantly higher than that of the children in the CT group (70.21%) (P < 0.05). In both groups, encephalomalacia, bilateral frontal subdural effusions, and gray-white matter atrophy of the brain were the main signs, and the difference in the proportion of these three imaging signs between the two groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Differences between the two groups examined for cerebral palsy subtypes were not significant (P > 0.05).
conclusionThe positive rate of pediatric cerebral palsy examined by MRI is higher than that of CT diagnosis, but the clinic should organically combine the two to further improve the detection validity and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.