Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38664761›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2024

"We're sinking": a qualitative interview-based study on stakeholder perceptions of structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system.

Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Stephana Julia Moss, Sara J Mizen, Cynthia Sriskandarajah, Emily A FitzGerald, Amity E Quinn, Fiona Clement, Brenlea Farkas, Alexandra Dodds, Melanie Columbus and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From Policy to Practice: A Qualitative Study on Reforms and Frontline Retention in Healthcare.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeanna Parsons LeighSchool of Health Administration, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. j.parsonsleigh@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8408-674X
Stephana Julia MossSchool of Health Administration, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1157-884X
Sara J MizenSchool of Health Administration, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Cynthia SriskandarajahSchool of Health Administration, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Emily A FitzGeraldSchool of Health Administration, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Amity E QuinnDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Fiona ClementDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Brenlea FarkasO'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alexandra DoddsSchool of Health Administration, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Melanie ColumbusO'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Henry T StelfoxO'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite longstanding efforts and calls for reform, Canada's incremental approach to healthcare changes has left the country lagging behind other OECD nations. Reform to the Canadian healthcare system is essential to develop a higher performing system. This study sought to gain a deeper understanding of the views of Canadian stakeholders on structural and process deficiencies and strategies to improve the Canadian healthcare system substantially and meaningfully.

methodsWe conducted individual, ~ 45-minute, semi-structured virtual interviews from May 2022 to August 2022. Using existing contacts and snowball sampling, we targeted one man and one woman from five regions in Canada across four stakeholder groups: (1) public citizens; (2) healthcare leaders; (3) academics; and (4) political decision makers. Interviews centered on participants' perceptions of the state of the current healthcare system, including areas where major improvements are required, and strategies to achieve suggested enhancements; Donabedian's Model (i.e., structure, process, outcomes) was the guiding conceptual framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified, and inductive thematic analysis was performed independently and in duplicate according to published methods.

resultsThe data from 31 interviews with 13 (41.9%) public citizens, 10 (32.3%) healthcare leaders, 4 (12.9%) academics, and 4 (12.9%) political decision makers resulted in three themes related to the structure of the healthcare system (1. system reactivity; 2. linkage with the Canadian identity; and 3. political and funding structures), three themes related to healthcare processes (1. staffing shortages; 2. inefficient care; and 3. inconsistent care), and three strategies to improve short- and long-term population health outcomes (1. delineating roles and revising incentives; 2. enhanced health literacy; 3. interdisciplinary and patient-centred care).

conclusionCanadians in our sample identified important structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system. Meaningful reforms are needed and will require addressing the link between the Canadian identity and our healthcare system to facilitate effective development and implementation of strategies to improve population health outcomes.

Indexed as

AccessCanadaHealthcareInterviewsQualityReformSystem

Identifiers

PMID38664761
PMCPMC11044548
OpenAlexW4395456401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.