ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Diagnosis model of early Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia based on convolutional neural network: a comparison with traditional PCR diagnostic method.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Utility of a Droplet Digital PCR-Based Assay for Quantitative Detection ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Article
- Diagnostic predictive evaluation of pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia using digital chest CT analysis combined with clinical features.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an interstitial pneumonia caused by pneumocystis jirovecii (PJ). The diagnosis of PJP primarily relies on the detection of the pathogen from lower respiratory tract specimens. However, it faces challenges such as difficulty in obtaining specimens and low detection rates. In the clinical diagnosis process, it is necessary to combine clinical symptoms, serological test results, chest Computed tomography (CT) images, molecular biology techniques, and metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for comprehensive analysis. PURPOSE: This study aims to overcome the limitations of traditional PJP diagnosis methods and develop a non-invasive, efficient, and accurate diagnostic approach for PJP. By using this method, patients can receive early diagnosis and treatment, effectively improving their prognosis.
methodsWe constructed an intelligent diagnostic model for PJP based on the different Convolutional Neural Networks. Firstly, we used the Convolutional Neural Network to extract CT image features from patients. Then, we fused the CT image features with clinical information features using a feature fusion function. Finally, the fused features were input into the classification network to obtain the patient's diagnosis result.
resultsIn this study, for the diagnosis of PJP, the accuracy of the traditional PCR diagnostic method is 77.58%, while the mean accuracy of the optimal diagnostic model based on convolutional neural networks is 88.90%.
conclusionThe accuracy of the diagnostic method proposed in this paper is 11.32% higher than that of the traditional PCR diagnostic method. The method proposed in this paper is an efficient, accurate, and non-invasive early diagnosis approach for PJP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.