Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38664699›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Exploring medical and nursing students' perceptions about a patient safety course: a qualitative study.

Farwa Ayub, Noreen Afzal, Wajid Ali, Fozia Asif, Syed Sabih Ul Hassan, Ghazal Haque, Fasih Ali Ahmed, Khairulnissa Ajani, Zahra Tharani, Mehtab Jaffer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Farwa AyubCentre for Patient Safety, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Noreen AfzalDean's Office, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Wajid AliDean's Office, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fozia AsifCentre for Patient Safety, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed Sabih Ul HassanCentre for Patient Safety, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ghazal HaqueCentre for Patient Safety, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fasih Ali AhmedCentre for Patient Safety, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Khairulnissa AjaniSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zahra TharaniSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mehtab JafferSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Adil H HaiderMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hanan J AboumatarArmstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Asad LatifCentre for Patient Safety, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. asad.latif@aku.edu.
Aga Khan University · PKJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEducating health professionals on patient safety can potentially reduce healthcare-associated harm. Patient safety courses have been incorporated into medical and nursing curricula in many high-income countries and their impact has been demonstrated in the literature through objective assessments. This study aimed to explore student perceptions about a patient safety course to assess its influence on aspiring health professionals at a personal level as well as to explore differences in areas of focus between medical and nursing students.

methodsA dedicated patient safety course was introduced for year III medical and year II and IV nursing students at the Aga Khan University (2021-2022). As part of a post-course assessment, 577 participating students (184 medical and 393 nursing) wrote reflections on the course, detailing its influence on them. These free-text responses were thematically analyzed using NVivo.

resultsThe findings revealed five major themes: acquired skills (clinical, interpersonal), understanding of medical errors (increased awareness, prevention and reduction, responding to errors), personal experiences with patient safety issues, impact of course (changed perceptions, professional integrity, need for similar sessions, importance of the topic) and course feedback (format, preparation for clinical years, suggestions). Students reported a lack of baseline awareness regarding the frequency and consequences of medical errors. After the course, medical students reported a perceptional shift in favor of systems thinking regarding error causality, and nursing students focused on human factors and error prevention. The interactive course format involving scenario-based learning was deemed beneficial in terms of increasing awareness, imparting relevant clinical and interpersonal skills, and changing perspectives on patient safety.

conclusionsStudent perspectives illustrate the benefits of an early introduction of dedicated courses in imparting patient safety education to aspiring health professionals. Students reported a lack of baseline awareness of essential patient safety concepts, highlighting gaps in the existing curricula. This study can help provide an impetus for incorporating patient safety as a core component in medical and nursing curricula nationally and across the region. Additionally, patient safety courses can be tailored to emphasize areas identified as gaps among each professional group, and interprofessional education can be employed for shared learning. The authors further recommend conducting longitudinal studies to assess the long-term impact of such courses.

Indexed as

CurriculumPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMedical ErrorsSaudi ArabiaLow- and middle-income countriesMedical school educationNursing school educationPatient safetyQualitative assessment

Identifiers

PMID38664699
PMCPMC11044541
OpenAlexW4395455234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.