ArticleScientific reports2024
Reference genes to study the sex-biased expression of genes regulating Drosophila metabolism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in the regulation and function of cellular immunity in Drosophila.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Sexually dimorphic ATF4 expression in the fat confers female stress tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2026Article
- Stability analysis of reference genes in Maconellicoccus hirsutus across various conditions including dsRNA treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Strategies for studying sex differences in brain aging.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
- Insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway promotes higher fat storage inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Stability and suitability of housekeeping genes in phlebotomine sand flies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Sex is an important variable in biology. Notable differences have been observed between male and female Drosophila in regulation of metabolism, in response to nutritional challenges, and in phenotypes relevant for obesity and metabolic disorders. The differences between males and females can be expected to result from differences in gene expression. We observed that expression levels of reference genes commonly used for normalization of qRT-PCR results such as GAPDH, β-actin, and 18SrRNA, show prominent sexual dimorphism. Since this will impact relative expression and conclusions related to that, we performed a systematic analysis of candidate reference genes with the objective of identifying reference genes with stable expression in male and female Drosophila. These reference genes (LamCa, βTub60D and βTub97EF) were then used to assess sex-specific differences in expression of metabolism associated genes. Additionally, we evaluated the utility of these reference genes following a nutritional challenge and showed that LamCa and βtub97EF are stably expressed between sexes and under different nutritional conditions and are thus suitable as reference genes. Our results highlight the importance of evaluating the stability of reference genes when sex-specific differences in gene expression are studied, and identify structural genes as a category worth exploring as reference genes in other species. Finally, we also uncovered hitherto unknown sexually dimorphic expression of a number of metabolism-associated genes, information of interest to others working in the field of metabolic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.