Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38664496›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Intra and interspecific audience effect on domestic dogs' behavioural displays and facial expressions.

Giulia Pedretti, Chiara Canori, Elisa Costantini, Rupert Palme, Paola Valsecchi, Sarah Marshall-Pescini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Familiar Dog or Familiar Person: Who Do Pet Dogs Best Synchronize with?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giulia PedrettiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. giulia.pedretti@unipr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4440-351X
Chiara CanoriDepartment of Chemistry, Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Viale Delle Scienze 17/A, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Elisa CostantiniDepartment of Chemistry, Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Viale Delle Scienze 17/A, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Rupert PalmeUnit of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9466-3662
Paola ValsecchiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Sarah Marshall-PesciniDomestication Lab, Konrad-Lorenz-Institute for Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria. sarah.marshall@vetmeduni.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P34675G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate the influence of both intra- and interspecific audiences on dogs' facial expressions and behaviours. Forty-six dogs were exposed to three test conditions in which a food reward, initially available, was denied when in the presence of either a human (Human condition) or a dog audience (Dog condition), or in the absence of a visible audience (Non-social condition). Salivary cortisol was collected to evaluate the stress/arousal activation in the different conditions. Compared to the Non-social condition, the presence of a conspecific evoked more facial expressions, according to the DogFACS (Facial Action Coding System, an anatomically based tool to analyze facial expressions in domestic dogs), (EAD105-Ears downward), displacement behaviours (AD137-Nose licking, AD37-Lip wiping), tail wagging, whining, and panting (AD126). When facing a conspecific, dogs assumed a more avoidant attitude, keeping a distance and not looking at the stimuli, compared to when in the presence of the human partner. Dogs also exhibited more facial expressions (EAD102-Ears Adductor, EAD104-Ears Rotator), displacement behaviours (AD137-Nose licking, AD37-Lip wiping), panting (AD126) and whining when facing the conspecific than the human partner. Post-test cortisol was not influenced by any condition, and no association between pre-test cortisol and behavioural variables was found, thus strong differences in the levels of stress/arousal were unlikely to be responsible for differences in behavior between conditions. Considering the current results in the context of the available literature, we suggest that the higher displacement behaviors exhibited with the conspecifics were likely due to an increased level of uncertainty regarding the situations.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalFacial ExpressionHydrocortisoneAnimalsDogsFemaleHumansMaleSalivaSocial BehaviorStress, PsychologicalHydrocortisoneAnimal communicationAudience effectsDisplacement behavioursDomestic dogFacial expressionsInterspecific communicationIntraspecific communicationStress signalsVisual signals

Identifiers

PMID38664496
PMCPMC11045831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.