ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024
To identify important MRI features to differentiate hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasms from septated hepatic cysts based on random forest.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiation between mucinous cystic neoplasms and simple cysts of the liver: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Differentiating multilocular hepatic cysts from mucinous cystic neoplasms: characteristic imaging signs and a machine learning diagnostic framework.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Analysis of Risk Prediction Model for Recurrence of Trigeminal Neuralgia After Percutaneous Balloon Compression.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Robotic left hepatectomy for the management of mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver with atypical presentation inside the biliary tract: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify important MRI features to differentiate hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) from septated hepatic cysts (HC) using random forest and compared with logistic regression algorithm.
methodsPathologically diagnosed hepatic cysts and hepatic MCNs with pre-operative contrast-enhanced MRI in our hospital from 2010 to 2023 were collected and only septated lesions on enhanced MRI were enrolled. A total of 21 septated HC and 18 MCNs were included in this study. Eighteen MRI features were analyzed and top important features were identified based on random forest (RF) algorithm. The results were evaluated by the prediction performance of a RF model combining the important features and compared with the performance of the logistic regression (LR) algorithm. Finally, for each identified feature, diagnostic probability, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared.
resultsFour variables, i.e., the septation arising from wall without indentation, multiseptate, intracapsular cyst sign, and solitary lesion were extracted as top important features with significance for MCNs by the random forest algorithm. The RF model using these variables had an AUC of 0.982 (0.95CI, 0.950-1.000), compared with the LR model based on two identified features with AUC of 0.931 (0.95CI, 0.846-1.000), p = 0.202. Among the four important features, multiseptate had the highest specificity (95.2%) and good sensitivity (72.2%, lower than the septation from wall without indentation, 94.4%) to diagnose MCNs.
conclusionFour out of 18 MRI features were extracted as reliably important factors to differ hepatic MCNs from septated HC. The combination of these four features in a RF model could achieve satisfactory diagnostic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.