ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024
Ultrasound Elastography in Benign Gynecology: A Scoping Review.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased Junctional Zone Stiffness and Serum Small Extracellular Vesicle Proteomic Signatures in Adenomyosis-Associated Infertility: An Exploratory SWE and Proteomic Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of stiffness values of normal uterine myometrium by 3T magnetic resonance elastography.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo perform a scoping review of the literature in which ultrasound elastography (UE) has been used in benign gynecology and identify avenues for its use in future research and clinical implementations.
methodsA structured search of EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane databases was conducted (last search date April 15th, 2022). Eligible studies included adult participants with female pelvic anatomy. English language papers focusing on the utility of ultrasound elastography applied to benign gynecology were included. Narrative reviews, conference abstracts, and letters to the editor were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for inclusion, a third reviewer was consulted in cases of disagreement. Study quality was assessed by a checklist for study implementation and elastography technique. Extracted data included elastography technology, gynecologic application, opportunities for clinical implementation, and strengths and limitations.
resultsThe search returned 2026 studies. A total of 40 studies, published between 2013 and 2022, were retained for data extraction. Studies most frequently used shear wave elastography as the method of UE (n = 23), followed by strain elastography (n = 13) and acoustic radiation force impulse (n = 4). Most common clinical applications for UE were the diagnosis of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids (27.5%), assessment of pelvic floor muscle function (22.5%), and describing the elastic properties of polycystic ovaries (17.5%) and the uterine cervix (15.0%). Limitations of the technology were identified as the lack of published reference values for gynecologic organs and difficulties in assessing tissues deep to the transducer.
conclusionFuture research is needed to validate the use of ultrasound elastography in gynecology under both normal and pathologic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.