Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38664348›Full record

SynthesisMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Neuroimage analysis using artificial intelligence approaches: a systematic review.

Eric Jacob Bacon, Dianning He, N'bognon Angèle D'avilla Achi, Lanbo Wang, Han Li, Patrick Dê Zélèman Yao-Digba, Patrice Monkam, Shouliang Qi

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Advances in artificial intelligence for neuroimaging.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eric Jacob BaconCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Dianning HeCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
N'bognon Angèle D'avilla AchiCollege of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Lanbo WangDepartment of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Han LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Patrick Dê Zélèman Yao-DigbaSoftware College, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Patrice MonkamCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China. patrice123china1@gmail.com.
Shouliang QiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China. qisl@bmie.neu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-1939

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities N2324004-13National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072008Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2020-BS-049Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2021-YGJC-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the contemporary era, artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a transformative evolution, exerting a profound influence on neuroimaging data analysis. This development has significantly elevated our comprehension of intricate brain functions. This study investigates the ramifications of employing AI techniques on neuroimaging data, with a specific objective to improve diagnostic capabilities and contribute to the overall progress of the field. A systematic search was conducted in prominent scientific databases, including PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus, meticulously curating 456 relevant articles on AI-driven neuroimaging analysis spanning from 2013 to 2023. To maintain rigor and credibility, stringent inclusion criteria, quality assessments, and precise data extraction protocols were consistently enforced throughout this review. Following a rigorous selection process, 104 studies were selected for review, focusing on diverse neuroimaging modalities with an emphasis on mental and neurological disorders. Among these, 19.2% addressed mental illness, and 80.7% focused on neurological disorders. It is found that the prevailing clinical tasks are disease classification (58.7%) and lesion segmentation (28.9%), whereas image reconstruction constituted 7.3%, and image regression and prediction tasks represented 9.6%. AI-driven neuroimaging analysis holds tremendous potential, transforming both research and clinical applications. Machine learning and deep learning algorithms outperform traditional methods, reshaping the field significantly.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingBrainHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningMental illnessNeuroimagingNeurological disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.