Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38664340›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

A natural language model to automate scoring of autobiographical memories.

Meladel Mistica, Patrick Haylock, Aleksandra Michalewicz, Steph Raad, Emily Fitzgerald, Caitlin Hitchcock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meladel MisticaMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), University of Melbourne, Melbourne Connect, Carlton, 3053, Victoria, Australia. misticam@unimelb.edu.au.
Patrick HaylockMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Tin Alley, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia.
Aleksandra MichalewiczMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), University of Melbourne, Melbourne Connect, Carlton, 3053, Victoria, Australia.
Steph RaadMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Tin Alley, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia.
Emily FitzgeraldMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), University of Melbourne, Melbourne Connect, Carlton, 3053, Victoria, Australia.
Caitlin HitchcockMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Tin Alley, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia. caitlin.hitchcock@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-0713

Funding

Australian Research Council DE200100043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biases in the retrieval of personal, autobiographical memories are a core feature of multiple mental health disorders, and are associated with poor clinical prognosis. However, current assessments of memory bias are either reliant on human scoring, restricting their administration in clinical settings, or when computerized, are only able to identify one memory type. Here, we developed a natural language model able to classify text-based memories as one of five different autobiographical memory types (specific, categoric, extended, semantic associate, omission), allowing easy assessment of a wider range of memory biases, including reduced memory specificity and impaired memory flexibility. Our model was trained on 17,632 text-based, human-scored memories obtained from individuals with and without experience of memory bias and mental health challenges, which was then tested on a dataset of 5880 memories. We used 20-fold cross-validation setup, and the model was fine-tuned over BERT. Relative to benchmarking and an existing support vector model, our model achieved high accuracy (95.7%) and precision (91.0%). We provide an open-source version of the model which is able to be used without further coding, by those with no coding experience, to facilitate the assessment of autobiographical memory bias in clinical settings, and aid implementation of memory-based interventions within treatment services.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallModels, PsychologicalNatural Language ProcessingYoung AdultAMTAutobiographical memory taskLarge language modelsNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38664340
PMCPMC11362422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.