ArticleDrug testing and analysis2025
Volumetric dried blood spots for determination of phosphatidylethanol: Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem masspectrometry method and clinical application.
Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiplex quantification of endocrine proteins in volumetric dried blood spots.Clinical proteomics · 2025Article
- Volumetric dried blood spots for determination of phosphatidylethanol: Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem masspectrometry method and clinical application.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) measurement in whole blood samples is established as a specific alcohol biomarker with clinical and forensic applications. Establishment of dried blood spots (DBSs) as a specimen for PEth determination offers several advantages and was the focus of this work. A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method using a 96-well format for sample preparation was developed and validated. PEth was extracted from DBSs by using isopropanol containing PEth-d5 as internal standard. The blood sampling used a commercial volumetric DBS device having a phosholipase D inhibitor incorporated to stop continuous PEth formation. The method quantified PEth in the range of 0.05-10 μmol/L, with a bias and imprecision of less than 15%. In a clinical study (n = 25) using fingerprick blood, the volumetric device offered more precise quantifications (CV 4.6%) compared with the Whatman 903 Protein Saver card device (CV 16.6%). In another clinical study (n = 48), the use of dried venous and capillary blood, and liquid venous blood was compared under real-life conditions with samples sent by postal service. The capillary and venous DBS samples gave identical results while the liquid blood gave slightly higher values. Calculation of elimination half-life (PEth 16:0/18:1) in 31 cases based on two consecutive samples with 2-9 days in between gave results (mean 6.2 days) that agree with literature but several cases with values over 10 days. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that volumetric DBS is a valid specimen for determination of PEth blood concentrations, offering several advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.