Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38663891›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Maintaining essential health services during a pandemic: lessons from Costa Rica's COVID-19 response.

Claudio A Mora-García, Andy A Pearson, Andrea M Prado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudio A Mora-GarcíaINCAE Business School, Alajuela, Costa Rica claudio.mora@incae.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0681-8830
Andy A PearsonINCAE Business School, Alajuela, Costa Rica.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-9695
Andrea M PradoINCAE Business School, Alajuela, Costa Rica.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-2938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on COVID-19 usually focus on health system responses to decrease the rate of COVID-19 infection and death, but patients with other diseases also require access to health services during the pandemic. This paper describes the structures and processes by which the Costa Rican Social Security Fund (CCSS) changed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which helped to sustain essential health services (EHSs). We conducted a desk review of the local literature and semistructured qualitative interviews with key informants from the CCSS. We found that the CCSS implemented changes in structure, such as creating a specialised COVID-19 centre and hiring additional interim health workers. The CCSS also implemented changes in processes, including leveraging its integrated network to optimise its resources and support alternative care modalities. These changes generated changes in outputs and outcomes that helped sustain EHSs for non-COVID-19 patients. These interventions were possible primarily due to Costa Rica's underlying health system, particularly its integrated nature with a single institution in charge of healthcare provision financed through mandatory health insurance, a unique digital medical record system and a contingency fund.

Indexed as

COVID-19Costa RicaDelivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social SecurityCOVID-19Decision MakingGlobal Health

Identifiers

PMID38663891
PMCPMC11056608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.