ArticleMedical image analysis2024
Stepwise incremental pretraining for integrating discriminative, restorative, and adversarial learning.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autodidactic dense anatomical models.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- AI-driven MRI biomarker for triple-class HER2 expression classification in breast cancer: a large-scale multicenter study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Self-supervised learning framework application for medical image analysis: a review and summary.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Review
- Representing Part-Whole Hierarchies in Foundation Models by Learning Localizability, Composability, and Decomposability from Anatomy via Self-Supervision.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2024Article
- Self-supervised learning for medical image analysis: Discriminative, restorative, or adversarial?Medical image analysis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have developed a United framework that integrates three self-supervised learning (SSL) ingredients (discriminative, restorative, and adversarial learning), enabling collaborative learning among the three learning ingredients and yielding three transferable components: a discriminative encoder, a restorative decoder, and an adversary encoder. To leverage this collaboration, we redesigned nine prominent self-supervised methods, including Rotation, Jigsaw, Rubik's Cube, Deep Clustering, TransVW, MoCo, BYOL, PCRL, and Swin UNETR, and augmented each with its missing components in a United framework for 3D medical imaging. However, such a United framework increases model complexity, making 3D pretraining difficult. To overcome this difficulty, we propose stepwise incremental pretraining, a strategy that unifies the pretraining, in which a discriminative encoder is first trained via discriminative learning, the pretrained discriminative encoder is then attached to a restorative decoder, forming a skip-connected encoder-decoder, for further joint discriminative and restorative learning. Last, the pretrained encoder-decoder is associated with an adversarial encoder for final full discriminative, restorative, and adversarial learning. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that the stepwise incremental pretraining stabilizes United models pretraining, resulting in significant performance gains and annotation cost reduction via transfer learning in six target tasks, ranging from classification to segmentation, across diseases, organs, datasets, and modalities. This performance improvement is attributed to the synergy of the three SSL ingredients in our United framework unleashed through stepwise incremental pretraining. Our codes and pretrained models are available at GitHub.com/JLiangLab/StepwisePretraining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.