Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38662797›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Emergent neural dynamics and geometry for generalization in a transitive inference task.

Kenneth Kay, Natalie Biderman, Ramin Khajeh, Manuel Beiran, Christopher J Cueva, Daphna Shohamy, Greg Jensen, Xue-Xin Wei, Vincent P Ferrera, L F Abbott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cognitive processes are disentangled at cortex-wide scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A mathematical theory of relational generalization in transitive inference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Neural dynamics of robust legged robots.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth KayMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-7217
Natalie BidermanMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ramin KhajehMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Manuel BeiranMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Christopher J CuevaDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Daphna ShohamyMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Greg JensenMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5050-4360
Xue-Xin WeiDepartments of Neuroscience and Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Vincent P FerreraMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
L F AbbottMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Implicit serial learning in monkeys and humansR01MH111703 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VINCENT P FERRERA, HERBERT S. TERRACE · 2018 to 2026
$5.6M
Neural dynamics and substrates of graphical knowledgeK99MH126158 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KAY, KENNETH NORMAN · 2021 to 2022
$251k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH126158NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relational cognition-the ability to infer relationships that generalize to novel combinations of objects-is fundamental to human and animal intelligence. Despite this importance, it remains unclear how relational cognition is implemented in the brain due in part to a lack of hypotheses and predictions at the levels of collective neural activity and behavior. Here we discovered, analyzed, and experimentally tested neural networks (NNs) that perform transitive inference (TI), a classic relational task (if A > B and B > C, then A > C). We found NNs that (i) generalized perfectly, despite lacking overt transitive structure prior to training, (ii) generalized when the task required working memory (WM), a capacity thought to be essential to inference in the brain, (iii) emergently expressed behaviors long observed in living subjects, in addition to a novel order-dependent behavior, and (iv) expressed different task solutions yielding alternative behavioral and neural predictions. Further, in a large-scale experiment, we found that human subjects performing WM-based TI showed behavior inconsistent with a class of NNs that characteristically expressed an intuitive task solution. These findings provide neural insights into a classical relational ability, with wider implications for how the brain realizes relational cognition.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionMemory, Short-TermNeural Networks, ComputerAdultComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalNerve NetTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38662797
PMCPMC11125559
OpenAlexW4395447584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.