ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2024
Protein-Centric Analysis of Personalized Antibody Repertoires Using LC-MS-Based Fab-Profiling on a timsTOF.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Prototype timsOmni Platform Enables Confident Annotation of the Key Hypervariable CDR3 Regions of IgG Immunoglobulins Using Low- and High-Energy Electron-Based Fragmentation.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- High-Throughput Monoclonal Antibody Peptide Mapping Using 15-s HPLC Gradients Coupled with Cyclic Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endogenous antibodies, or immunoglobulins (Igs), abundantly present in body fluids, represent some of the most challenging samples to analyze, largely due to the immense variability in their sequences and concentrations. It has been estimated that our body can produce billions of different Ig proteins with different isotypes, making their individual analysis seemingly impossible. However, recent advances in protein-centric proteomics using LC-MS coupled to Orbitrap mass analyzers to profile intact Fab fragments formed by selective cleavage at the IgG-hinge revealed that IgG repertoires may be less diverse, albeit unique for each donor. Serum repertoires seem to be dominated by a few hundred clones that cumulatively make up 50-95% of the total IgG content. Enabling such analyses required careful optimization of the chromatography and mass analysis, as all Fab analytes are highly alike in mass (46-51 kDa) and sequence. To extend the opportunities of this mass-spectrometry-based profiling of antibody repertoires, we here report the optimization and evaluation of an alternative MS platform, namely, the timsTOF, for antibody repertoire profiling. The timsTOF mass analyzer has gained traction in recent years for peptide-centric proteomics and found wide applicability in plasma proteomics, affinity proteomics, and HLA peptidomics, to name a few. However, for protein-centric analysis, this platform has been less explored. Here, we demonstrate that the timsTOF platform can be adapted to perform protein-centric LC-MS-based profiling of antibody repertoires. In a side-by-side comparison of the timsTOF and the Orbitrap we demonstrate that the extracted serum antibody repertoires are alike qualitatively and quantitatively, whereby in particular the sensitivity of the timsTOF platform excels. Future incorporation of advanced top-down capabilities on the timsTOF may make this platform a very valuable alternative for protein-centric proteomics and top-down proteomics and thus also for personalized antibody repertoire profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.