Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38662274›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2024

Recurrent ventilator-associated pneumonia in severe Covid-19 ARDS patients requiring ECMO support.

Elena Collado-Lledó, Quentin Moyon, Juliette Chommeloux, Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Guillaume Hékimian, Ouriel Saura, David Lévy, Matthieu Schmidt, Alain Combes, Charles-Edouard Luyt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. COVID-19: a multi-organ perspective.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elena Collado-LledóSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Quentin MoyonSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Juliette ChommelouxSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Marc Pineton de ChambrunSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Guillaume HékimianSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Ouriel SauraSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
David LévySorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Matthieu SchmidtSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Alain CombesSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Charles-Edouard Luyt *Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France. charles-edouard.luyt@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-2705
Lucie Le Fevre *Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) recurrence in COVID-19 patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, and to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial treatment duration of the first VAP episode on VAP recurrence.

methodsAdult patients with COVID-19 severe pneumonia on ECMO admitted between March 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively included. Primary outcome was incidence of VAP recurrence, and secondary outcome was the impact of duration of antimicrobial treatment on VAP recurrence.

resultsAmong the 252 included patients, 226 (90%) developed a first VAP. Sixteen had lung abscess and were excluded, leaving 210 patients. VAP recurrence occurred in 172 patients (82%), with a median (IQR) time from first VAP to recurrence of 10 (7-13) days. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae were respectively responsible for 28% and 52% of first VAP, and 51% and 62% of first recurrence episodes. Among the 210 patients with a first VAP, 158 (75%) received a short course of antibiotics [< 8 days, median (IQR) duration 6 (5-7) days] and 52 (25%) received a prolonged course of antibiotics [≥ 8 days, median (IQR) duration 9 (8-10) days]. Estimated cumulative incidence of VAP recurrence, taking into account death and extubation as competing risks, was not different in patients with short- and prolonged-antimicrobial treatment.

conclusionsIn patients with severe Covid-19-ARDS requiring ECMO support, VAP recurrence occurs frequently, with Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as predominant causative microorganisms. An antimicrobial treatment of ≥ 8 days for the treatment of first VAP episode did not reduce the risk of VAP recurrence, as compared to shorter duration.

Indexed as

COVID-19ECMOVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID38662274
PMCPMC11045714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.