ArticleDysphagia2025
Reliability and Validity Analyses of the Practical Assessment of Dysphagia Test in Stroke.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Key indicators for prioritizing swallowing assessment in acute ischemic stroke patients in the emergency room.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Article
- The Development of an Artificial Intelligence Video Analysis-Based Web Application to Diagnose Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the validity and reliability of the Practical Assessment of Dysphagia (PAD) test as a quantitative and organ-specific test for stroke patients. In this study, PAD test data from 109 patients with stroke were used. The internal consistency of the PAD was analyzed using Cronbach's α value. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the PAD were analyzed using Kappa coefficient. Concurrent validity was evaluated based on the correlation between PAD and the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). The diagnostic accuracy of the PAD test in patients with stroke was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.98 and 0.99, respectively) were significant (p < 0.001) for the total PAD score. The functional dysphagia scale (FDS) score and penetration-aspiration score (PAS) correlated significantly with PAD (p < 0.001). The results of the ROC curve analysis with various cut-off points showed that the PAD test had high sensitivity and specificity. The PAD has high reliability and validity. Therefore, it is a useful screening test for dysphagia in patients with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.