Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38662189›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2024

Comparative karyotype analysis of the red brocket deer (M. americana sensu lato and M. rufa) complex: evidence of drastic chromosomal evolution and implications on speciation process.

Agda Maria Bernegossi, David Javier Galindo, Pedro Henrique Faria Peres, Miluse Vozdova, Halina Cernohorska, Svatava Kubickova, Dita Kadlcikova, Jiri Rubes, José Maurício Barbanti Duarte

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neo-X-Linked Chromosome Polymorphism: Cytogenetic Insights fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. ZooKeys · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Agda Maria Bernegossi *Deer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil.
David Javier Galindo *Deer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil. dgalindoh@unmsm.edu.pe.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-268X
Pedro Henrique Faria PeresDeer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil.
Miluse VozdovaCentral European Institute of Technology-Veterinary Research Institute, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Halina CernohorskaCentral European Institute of Technology-Veterinary Research Institute, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Svatava KubickovaCentral European Institute of Technology-Veterinary Research Institute, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Dita KadlcikovaCentral European Institute of Technology-Veterinary Research Institute, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiri RubesCentral European Institute of Technology-Veterinary Research Institute, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
José Maurício Barbanti DuarteDeer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil. mauricio.barbanti@unesp.br.
Central European Institute of Technology · CZUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRNational University of San Marcos · PE

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica 116-2017-FONDECYTFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/07014-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/06940-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/13187-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/14536-6Grantová Agentura České Republiky 20-22517J
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements are often associated with playing a role in the speciation process. However, the underlying mechanism that favors the genetic isolation associated with chromosomal changes remains elusive. In this sense, the genus Mazama is recognized by its high level of karyotype diversity among species with similar morphology. A cryptic species complex has been identified within the genus, with the red brocket deer (Mazama americana and Mazama rufa) being the most impressive example. The chromosome variation was clustered in cytotypes with diploid numbers ranging from 42 to 53 and was correlated with geographical location. We conducted an analysis of chromosome evolution of the red brocket deer complex using comparative chromosome painting and Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) clones among different cytotypes. The aim was to deepen our understanding of the karyotypic relationships within the red brocket, thereby elucidating the significant chromosome variation among closely related species. This underscores the significance of chromosome changes as a key evolutionary process shaping their genomes. The results revealed the presence of three distinct cytogenetic lineages characterized by significant karyotypic divergence, suggesting the existence of efficient post-zygotic barriers. Tandem fusions constitute the main mechanism driving karyotype evolution, following a few centric fusions, inversion X-autosomal fusions. The BAC mapping has improved our comprehension of the karyotypic relationships within the red brocket deer complex, prompting questions regarding the role of these changes in the speciation process. We propose the red brocket as a model group to investigate how chromosomal changes contribute to isolation and explore the implications of these changes in taxonomy and conservation.

Indexed as

DeerEvolution, MolecularGenetic SpeciationKaryotypeKaryotypingAnimalsChromosome PaintingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosome evolutionChromosome rearrangementsFISHMolecular cytogeneticsNeotropical deer, Cervidae

Identifiers

PMID38662189
OpenAlexW4395450003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.