Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38662091›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2024

Efficacy and safety of antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacteria in nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

David Luque Paz, Dara Chean, Pierre Tattevin, Damien Luque Paz, Betsega Assefa Bayeh, Achille Kouatchet, Delphine Douillet, Jérémie Riou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David Luque PazInfectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, 2, rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex 9, France. david.luque.paz@chu-rennes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-7305
Dara CheanIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
Pierre TattevinInfectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, 2, rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex 9, France.
Damien Luque PazLaboratory of Hematology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Betsega Assefa BayehDepartment of Pneumology and Respiratory Functional Exploration, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.
Achille KouatchetIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
Delphine Douillet *Emergency Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Jérémie Riou *University of Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, 49000, Angers, France.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité d'Angers · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple randomized controlled studies have compared numerous antibiotic regimens, including new, recently commercialized antibiotics in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (NP). The objective of this Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and the safety of different antibiotic treatments for NP.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases from 2000 through 2021. The study selection included studies comparing antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacilli in the setting of NP. The primary endpoint was 28 day mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure, microbiological cure and adverse events.

resultsSixteen studies encompassing 4993 patients were included in this analysis comparing 13 antibiotic regimens. The level of evidence for mortality comparisons ranged from very low to moderate. No significant difference in 28 day mortality was found among all beta-lactam regimens. Only the combination of meropenem plus aerosolized colistin was associated with a significant decrease of mortality compared to using intravenous colistin alone (OR = 0.43; 95% credible interval [0.17-0.94]), based on the results of the smallest trial included. The clinical failure rate of ceftazidime was higher than meropenem with (OR = 1.97; 95% CrI [1.19-3.45]) or without aerosolized colistin (OR = 1.40; 95% CrI [1.00-2.01]), imipemen/cilastatin/relebactam (OR = 1.74; 95% CrI [1.03-2.90]) and ceftazidime/avibactam (OR = 1.48; 95% CrI [1.02-2.20]). For microbiological cure, no substantial difference between regimens was found, but ceftolozane/tazobactam had the highest probability of being superior to comparators. In safety analyses, there was no significant difference between treatments for the occurrence of adverse events, but acute kidney failure was more common in patients receiving intravenous colistin.

conclusionsThis network meta-analysis suggests that most antibiotic regimens, including new combinations and cefiderocol, have similar efficacy and safety in treating susceptible Gram-negative bacilli in NP. Further studies are necessary for NP caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Registration PROSPERO CRD42021226603.

Indexed as

AntibioticsGram-negative bacilliNetwork meta-analysisNosocomial pneumoniaVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID38662091
PMCPMC11045692
OpenAlexW4395463997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.