Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38662018›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2024

Do high-protein diets have the potential to reduce gut barrier function in a sex-dependent manner?

Daniel James, Carlos Poveda, Gemma E Walton, J Stephen Elmore, Brandon Linden, John Gibson, Bruce A Griffin, M Denise Robertson, Marie C Lewis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The British journal of nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. UnravelingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel JamesDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK. d.james3@pgr.reading.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4263-9445
Carlos PovedaDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK.
Gemma E WaltonDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK.
J Stephen ElmoreDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK.
Brandon LindenDepartment of Nutrition, Food & Exercise Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
John GibsonFood and Feed Innovations, Woodstock, Newcastle Rd, Woore, N Shropshire, CW3 95N, UK.
Bruce A GriffinDepartment of Nutrition, Food & Exercise Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
M Denise RobertsonDepartment of Nutrition, Food & Exercise Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Marie C LewisDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK.
University of Reading · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBShropshire Council · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008776/1Food and Feed Innovations Food and Feed Innovations
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImpaired gut barrier function is associated with systemic inflammation and many chronic diseases. Undigested dietary proteins are fermented in the colon by the gut microbiota which produces nitrogenous metabolites shown to reduce barrier function in vitro. With growing evidence of sex-based differences in gut microbiotas, we determined whether there were sex by dietary protein interactions which could differentially impact barrier function via microbiota modification.

methodsFermentation systems were inoculated with faeces from healthy males (n = 5) and females (n = 5) and supplemented with 0.9 g of non-hydrolysed proteins sourced from whey, fish, milk, soya, egg, pea, or mycoprotein. Microbial populations were quantified using fluorescence in situ hybridisation with flow cytometry. Metabolite concentrations were analysed using gas chromatography, solid phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and ELISA.

resultsIncreased protein availability resulted in increased proteolytic Bacteroides spp (p < 0.01) and Clostridium coccoides (p < 0.01), along with increased phenol (p < 0.01), p-cresol (p < 0.01), indole (p = 0.018) and ammonia (p < 0.01), varying by protein type. Counts of Clostridium cluster IX (p = 0.03) and concentration of p-cresol (p = 0.025) increased in males, while females produced more ammonia (p = 0.02), irrespective of protein type. Further, we observed significant sex-protein interactions affecting bacterial populations and metabolites (p < 0.005).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that protein fermentation by the gut microbiota in vitro is influenced by both protein source and the donor's sex. Should these results be confirmed through human studies, they could have major implications for developing dietary recommendations tailored by sex to prevent chronic illnesses.

Indexed as

Diet, High-ProteinFecesFermentationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultBacteroidesDietary ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsDietary ProteinsDietary proteinGut microbiotaIn vitro gut systemsMicrobial-derived metabolic end productsSexual dimorphisms

Identifiers

PMID38662018
PMCPMC11377480
OpenAlexW4395452877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.