Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38661571›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Changes in Compliance With Bans on Tobacco Product Display and Advertising at Traditional and Modern Point-of-Sale Retailers in Depok, Indonesia, 2019-2021.

Qinghua Nian, Ryan David Kennedy, Dina Ariani, Kathy Wright, Jennifer L Brown, Tara Singh Bam, Made Kerta Duana, Diah Setyawati Dewanti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qinghua NianDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9551-1599
Ryan David KennedyDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9448-5234
Dina ArianiGrows and Giggles Healthy Clinic, Jakarta, Selatan, Indonesia.
Kathy WrightTobacco Control Department, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, New York City, NY, USA.
Jennifer L BrownDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7418-1172
Tara Singh BamInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Asia Pacific Office, Singapore, Singapore.
Made Kerta DuanaFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
Diah Setyawati DewantiFaculty of Economics and Business, Department of Economics, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta,Indonesia.

Funding

Bloomberg Philanthropies' Bloomberg Initiative to Reduce Tobacco Use
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBanning Point-of-Sale (POS) advertising and product display is an important tobacco control strategy. Depok, Indonesia enacted some regional tobacco control policies regulating the POS environment in 2021. This study examined changes in compliance before and after the implementation of these policies as of 2021.

methodsData collectors visited 180 modern retailers (hyper/supermarkets/convenience stores) and 147 traditional retailers (warungs) in 2019. The same retailers were revisited in 2021. Data collectors assessed compliance with tobacco product display, and advertising regulations at POS, including if products were displayed in spaces to target minors (near candy or at a child's eye level). Data were analyzed using McNemar and Mann-Whitney U tests.

resultsFrom 2019 to 2021, in modern retailers, tobacco product display (95.6% vs. 52.2%) and product advertising (36.1% vs. 3.9%) were significantly reduced (p < .001). In traditional retailers, tobacco product display (94.6% in 2019, 91.2% in 2021, p > .05) and product advertising (87.1% in 2019, 87.8% in 2021, p > .05) remained common during both data collection periods. Tobacco products were commonly displayed in spaces to target minors in both modern retailers (43.3% in 2019, 34.4% in 2021, p > .05) and traditional retailers (90.5% in 2019, 83.0% in 2021, p > .05).

conclusionsCompliance with bans on tobacco product advertising and display at modern retailers improved significantly from 2019 to 2021; however, most modern retailers continue to display tobacco products in 2021. Traditional retailers remain largely noncompliant. Tobacco products are commonly displayed in areas that target minors. The enforcement of regional regulations should be strengthened, particularly among traditional retailers. IMPLICATIONS: In Depok, Indonesia, tobacco advertising and product display bans have been implemented; however, more work is needed to support compliance. Enforcement efforts, such as those carried out by civil police, can focus on tobacco product display bans in traditional and modern retailers, and traditional retailers need additional support to remove tobacco product advertising. Retailers may receive money from the tobacco industry for these advertisements. Creative solutions may include supporting retailers in finding alternative advertising revenue.

Indexed as

AdvertisingCommerceTobacco ProductsHumansIndonesia

Identifiers

PMID38661571
PMCPMC11494614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.