ArticleRadiation research2024
Radiation Biological Toximetry Using Circulating Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) for Rapid Radiation/Nuclear Triage.
Article in Radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Cell-free DNA as a biomarker for radiation-induced injury: From mechanistic insights to clinical translation.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Centers for Medical Countermeasures against Radiation Consortium: Past, Present, and Beyond.Radiation research · 2025Review
- Development of Nanocarrier-Based Oral Pegfilgrastim Formulations for Mitigating Hematopoietic Acute Radiation Syndrome.Advanced functional materials · 2025Article
- Advancing cell-free DNA as a biomarker of damage to heart caused by ionizing radiation.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal triage biodosimetry would include risk stratification within minutes, and it would provide useful triage despite heterogeneous dosimetry, cytokine therapy, mixed radiation quality, race, and age. For regulatory approval, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biodosimetry Guidance requires suitability for purpose and a validated species-independent mechanism. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration assays may provide such triage information. To test this hypothesis, cfDNA concentrations were measured in unprocessed monkey plasma using a branched DNA (bDNA) technique with a laboratory developed test. The cfDNA levels, along with hematopoietic parameters, were measured over a 7-day period in Rhesus macaques receiving total body radiation doses ranging from 1 to 6.5 Gy. Low-dose irradiation (0-2 Gy) was easily distinguished from high-dose whole-body exposures (5.5 and 6.5 Gy). Fold changes in cfDNA in the monkey model were comparable to those measured in a bone marrow transplant patient receiving a supralethal radiation dose, suggesting that the lethal threshold of cfDNA concentrations may be similar across species. Average cfDNA levels were 50 ± 40 ng/mL [±1 standard deviation (SD)] pre-irradiation, 120 ± 13 ng/mL at 1 Gy; 242 ± 71 ng/mL at 2 Gy; 607 ± 54 at 5.5 Gy; and 1585 ± 351 at 6.5 Gy (±1 SD). There was an exponential increase in cfDNA concentration with radiation dose. Comparison of the monkey model with the mouse model and the Guskova model, developed using Chernobyl responder data, further demonstrated correlation across species, supporting a similar mechanism of action. The test is available commercially in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) ready form in the U.S. and the European Union. The remaining challenges include developing methods for further simplification of specimen processing and assay evaluation, as well as more accurate calibration of the triage category with cfDNA concentration cutoffs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.