Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38661468›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2024

Combat and operational stress programs and interventions: A scoping review using a tiered prevention framework.

Denise C Cooper, Marjorie S Campbell, Margaret Baisley, Christina L Hein, Tim Hoyt

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Returning home from a full-scale armed conflict: A rapid review of short post-deployment psychological practices.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Introduction to special issue section: Resilience to stress and trauma within the military environment.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Outcome metrics utilized in evaluations of programs and interventions for combat and operational stress: A review of psychometric properties.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denise C CooperPsychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Marjorie S CampbellPsychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4923-8899
Margaret BaisleyPsychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Christina L HeinDepartment of Behavioral Health, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA.
Tim HoytPsychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6395-7887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beginning in 1999, Department of Defense policy directed the military services to develop Combat and Operational Stress Control (COSC) programs to address prevention, early identification, and management of the negative effects of combat and operational stress. The aim of this study is to provide a narrative review of COSC programs and organize them into a prevention framework to clarify gaps and future directions. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies between 2001 and 2020 in peer-reviewed articles or government-sponsored reports describing an evaluation of COSC programs. The target population of these programs was US service members who had participated in an intervention designed to address combat or operational stress in a deployed, operational, or field setting. These programs then were rated for level of evidence and categorized using a tiered prevention model. This search identified 36 published evaluations of 19 COSC programs and interventions from. Most programs were described as effective in addressing target outcomes, with behavioral health outcomes reported for 13 of the 19 identified programs; the remaining six focused on knowledge base and behavior changes. Delivery of these prevention programs also ranged from peer-based implementation to formal treatment, including programs at all prevention levels. COSC interventions show promise for helping service members manage stress, with more than half of the programs showing evidence from studies using randomized designs. Future iterations of COSC program evaluations should explore the development of a joint curriculum using existing content in a tiered prevention framework.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelCombat DisordersHumansOccupational StressStress, PsychologicalUnited Statescombat stressdeploymentforward interventionMilitaryoperational stress

Identifiers

PMID38661468
PMCPMC11057676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.