Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38661467›Full record

ReviewMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2024

Resilience enhancing programs in the U.S. military: An exploration of theory and applied practice.

Sarah A McInerney, Edward Waldrep, Charles C Benight

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Self-distancing is positively related to higher scores during U.S. Army (USA) Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) advanced leadership training.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Time for a break? Perceptions and impacts of reconstitution among United States Air Force remotely piloted aircraft personnel.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Resilience Framework for Research in Oncology Massage Therapy.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Optimizing military mental health and stress resilience training through the lens of trainee preferences: A conjoint analysis approach.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Grit and uncertainty: Grit predicts performance and West Point graduation during pandemic conditions.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Introduction to special issue section: Resilience to stress and trauma within the military environment.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah A McInerneyDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8869-5024
Edward WaldrepDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6014-1700
Charles C BenightDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8066-109X
University of Colorado System · USDepartment of Veterans Affairs · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

U.S. service members are at an enhanced risk for developing mental disorders. To address these challenges, while promoting operational readiness and improving mental health outcomes, the Department of Defense directed each service component to develop and implement universal resilience enhancing programs. This paper provides a review of theoretical approaches conceptualizing resilience to trauma, including the theoretical foundations of programs currently in place. The resilience programs of U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps are described, and available program effectiveness data are reviewed. Gaps between theory and practice are identified and an alternative method of assessing psychological readiness in Army units that is informed by resilience theory is offered as one way to address these gaps and scientific concerns. By comprehensively assessing the stressors affecting Soldiers at regular intervals, military leaders may be able to better identify and mitigate stressors in a systematic way that bolsters individual and unit psychological fitness. An enhanced psychological readiness metric stands to strengthen the validity of current resilience programs, bring clarity to the mechanisms of resilience, and provide a novel way for leaders to promote readiness in their units. Application of this metric within the infrastructure of existing reporting systems stands to improve mental health outcomes for Service Members, enhance the psychological readiness of the force, and reduce healthcare costs over time.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelResilience, PsychologicalHumansUnited Statesmilitary mental healthmilitary resiliencepsychological readinessResilienceresilience theory

Identifiers

PMID38661467
PMCPMC11057578
OpenAlexW4282548062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.