Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38661420›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2024

All "wrapped" up in reflection: supporting metacognitive awareness to promote students' self-regulated learning.

Ayuni Ratnayake, Aditi Bansal, Natalie Wong, Theluckshan Saseetharan, Sapolnach Prompiengchai, Amy Jenne, Jeneni Thiagavel, Aarthi Ashok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Breaking confirmatory spells by implementing research-integrated CUREs.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ayuni RatnayakeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-6918-9175
Aditi BansalDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Natalie WongDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Theluckshan SaseetharanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sapolnach PrompiengchaiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amy JenneDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jeneni ThiagavelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aarthi AshokDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-6878-5948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is the process of utilizing effective strategies to acquire knowledge or skills and is influenced by motivation, metacognitive processing, and study-related behaviors. We hypothesized that by using survey tools that allow reflection on and refinement of students' study strategies, we could nurture metacognitive skill development, encourage positive motivation and study-related behaviors, and hence promote academic success. Undergraduate students in a semester-long, second-year biology course were provided with resources to promote SRL and three survey instruments that encouraged them to create study plans and reflect on the effectiveness of their study strategies. Using a student-partnered approach, we sought to investigate the role of metacognition, motivation, and study-related behaviors on academic performance by (i) identifying the self-regulated learning strategies most utilized by students, (ii) investigating the role of reflection in enhancing metacognitive processing and academic performance, and (iii) understanding whether students created and/or modified their study strategies as an outcome of self-regulation. Survey responses allowed us to understand the repertoire of study strategies used by students. Our analyses suggest that students demonstrated metacognitive skill development through the use of the resources and reflection instruments, as they accurately reported on the effectiveness of their study strategies and indicated future plans to shift study-related behaviors from passive to active reviewing techniques. Students across the grade spectrum perceived the reflection instruments as beneficial in identifying areas of improvement and developing long-term study habits, suggesting that these instruments were effective in promoting metacognitive skill development for a variety of student learners. We conclude that supporting students with resources that promote SRL and providing opportunities for timely reflection can promote metacognitive skill development, a key feature of academic success.

Indexed as

academic performancebiology educationexam-wrappermetacognitionreflectionself-regulated learningstudy strategies

Identifiers

PMID38661420
PMCPMC11044636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.