ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Multivalent DNAzyme agents for cleaving folded RNA.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in DNAzyme Selection, Molecular Engineering and Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Opening new frontiers with catalytic nucleic acids in miRNA inhibition.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multivalent recognition and binding of biological molecules is a natural phenomenon that increases the binding stability (avidity) without decreasing the recognition specificity. In this study, we took advantage of this phenomenon to increase the efficiency and maintain high specificity of RNA cleavage by DNAzymes (Dz). We designed a series of DNA constructs containing two Dz agents, named here bivalent Dz devices (BDD). One BDD increased the cleavage efficiency of a folded RNA fragment up to 17-fold in comparison with the Dz of a conventional design. Such an increase was achieved due to both the improved RNA binding and the increased probability of RNA cleavage by the two catalytic cores. By moderating the degree of Dz agent association in BDD, we achieved excellent selectivity in differentiating single-base mismatched RNA, while maintaining relatively high cleavage rates. Furthermore, a trivalent Dz demonstrated an even greater efficiency than the BDD in cleaving folded RNA. The data suggests that the cooperative action of several RNA-cleaving units can significantly improve the efficiency and maintain high specificity of RNA cleavage, which is important for the development of Dz-based gene knockdown agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.