Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660923›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2024

Niche-based approach to explore the impacts of environmental disturbances on biodiversity.

Jarrod Sopniewski, Renee Catullo, Michelle Ward, Nicola Mitchell, Ben C Scheele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Uncovering correlates of decline and critical refuges for a threatened terrestrial mammal.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Niche-based approach to explore the impacts of environmental disturbances on biodiversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jarrod SopniewskiSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4554-6766
Renee CatulloSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Michelle WardWWF-Aus, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicola MitchellSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Ben C ScheeleFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-629X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, species are increasingly at risk from compounding threatening processes, an increasingly prominent driver of which is environmental disturbances. To facilitate effective conservation efforts following such events, methods that evaluate potential impacts across multiple species and provide landscape-scale information are needed to guide targeted responses. Often, the geographic overlap between a disturbance and species' distribution is calculated and then used as a proxy for potential impact. However, such methods do not account for the important influence of environmental heterogeneity throughout species' ranges. To address this shortcoming, we quantified the effects of environmental disturbances on species' environmental niche space. Using the Australian 2019 and 2020 Black Summer fires as a case study, we applied a niche-centric approach to examine the potential impacts of these fires on 387 vertebrate species. We examined the utility of established and novel niche metrics to assess the potential impacts of large-scale disturbance events on species by comparing the potential effects of the fires as determined by our various niche measures to those derived from geographic-based measures of impact. We examined the quality of environmental space affected by the disturbance by quantifying the position in niche space where the disturbance occurred (center or margin), the uniqueness of the environmental space that was burned, and the degree to which the remaining, unburned portion of the niche differed from a species' original prefire niche. There was limited congruence between the proportion of geographic and niche space affected, which showed that geographic-based approaches in isolation may have underestimated the impact of the fires for 56% of modeled species. For each species, when combined, these metrics provided a greater indication of postdisturbance recovery potential than geographic-based measures alone. Accordingly, the integration of niche-based analyses into conservation assessments following large-scale disturbance events will lead to a more nuanced understanding of potential impacts and guide more informed and effective conservation actions.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesVertebratesAnimalsAustraliaEcosystemFiresWildfirescambio de nichoconservación sistemáticaconservation ecologyconservation planningecología de la conservaciónincendiomargen de nichoniche marginniche shiftnicho de especieplaneación de la conservaciónspecies nichesystematic conservationwildfire

Identifiers

PMID38660923
PMCPMC11588999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.