Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660922›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2024

Exploring local perceptions and drivers of engagement in biodiversity monitoring among participants in payments for ecosystem services schemes in southeastern Mexico.

Santiago Izquierdo-Tort, Andrea Alatorre, Paulina Arroyo-Gerala, Elizabeth Shapiro-Garza, Julia Naime, Jérôme Dupras

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Santiago Izquierdo-TortInstituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0139-6839
Andrea AlatorreDépartement Des Sciences Naturelles, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Ripon, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6880-7749
Paulina Arroyo-GeralaNatura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos AC, Mexico City, Mexico.
Elizabeth Shapiro-GarzaNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4272-3605
Julia NaimeCenter for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
Jérôme DuprasInstitut des Sciences de la Forêt tempérée, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Ripon, Quebec, Canada.
Center for International Forestry Research · IDDuke University · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversité du Québec en Outaouais · CAUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Canada Research Chair in Ecological EconomicsCanadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Institutional Grants 7032256FWOFRQ bilateral Flanders-Québec research cooperation grant ePEStemologyproject,GrantG0E8121NMitacs IT10488Ouranos RF580003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Payments for ecosystem services (PES) are widely applied incentive-based instruments with diverse objectives that increasingly include biodiversity conservation. Yet, there is a gap in understanding of how to best assess and monitor programs' biodiversity outcomes. We examined perceptions and drivers of engagement related to biodiversity monitoring through surveys among current PES participants in 7 communities in Mexico's Selva Lacandona. We conducted workshops among survey participants that included training and field deployment of tools used to monitor biodiversity and land cover, including visual transects, camera traps, acoustic recorders, and forest cover satellite images. We conducted pre- and postworkshop surveys in each community to evaluate changes in respondents' perceptions following exposure to biodiversity monitoring training and related field activities. We also reviewed existing research on participatory environmental management and monitoring approaches. One quarter of current PES participants in the study area participated in our surveys and workshops. The majority stated interest in engaging in diverse activities related to the procedural aspects of biodiversity monitoring (e.g., planning, field data collection, results dissemination) and acknowledged multiple benefits of introducing biodiversity monitoring into PES (e.g., knowledge and capacity building, improved natural resource management, and greater support for conservation). Household economic reliance on PES was positively associated with willingness to engage in monitoring. Technical expertise, time, and monetary constraints were deterrents. Respondents were most interested in monitoring mammals, birds, and plants and using visual transects, camera traps, and forest cover satellite images. Exposure to monitoring enhanced subsequent interest in monitoring by providing respondents with new insights from their communities related to deforestation and species' abundance and diversity. Respondents identified key strengths and weaknesses of applying different monitoring tools, which suggests that deploying multiple tools simultaneously can increase local engagement and produce complementary findings and data. Overall, our findings support the relevance and usefulness of incorporating participatory biodiversity monitoring into PES.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMexicobiodiversity conservationChiapasconservación de la biodiversidadconservation paymentsMexicoMéxicomonitoreo ambiental participativopagos por conservaciónpagos por servicios ambientalesparticipación de las partes interesadasparticipatory environmental monitoringpayments for ecosystem servicesstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID38660922
PMCPMC11588995
OpenAlexW4395453957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.