ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Screening for thalassemia carriers among the Han population of childbearing age in Southwestern of China.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing traditional and NGS-based screening strategies for thalassemia in a high-prevalence Hakka population: a population-based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mapping Current and Emerging Laboratory Techniques for Haemoglobinopathy Carrier Detection and Prevention: A Narrative Review from the HELIOS Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Heterogeneous Global Burden of Hemoglobinopathies Among Women of Childbearing Age, 1990-2021, with Projection to 2030.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Saliva Sample-Based Non-Invasive Carrier Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Hereditary Hearing Loss, and Thalassemia in 13,926 Women of Reproductive Age From South Zhejiang.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Thalassemia is a severe hereditary blood disorder that poses a significant threat to human health and leads to mortality and disability. It is one of the most prevalent monogenic diseases worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze the molecular epidemiological data of individuals of childbearing age from the Han ethnic group with thalassemia in Southwest China and to explore the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in screening thalassemia carriers. Methods: The participants were Han males and females of childbearing age who sought medical advice at the West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University from June 2022 to June 2023. We detected α- and β-thalassemia mutations using full-length capture of the thalassemia genes and NGS technology. Results: In a cohort of 1,093 participants, 130 thalassemia carriers were identified, with an overall detection rate of 11.89% (130/1,093). Among these, 0.91% (10/1,093) had mutations that could not be detected using traditional PCR techniques. The proportions of carriers with α-, β-, and α-complexed β-thalassemia gene mutations were 7.68% (84/1,093), 3.93% (43/1,093), and 0.27% (3/1,093), respectively. We identified a novel HBA2 c.166del variant that has not been previously reported. Conclusion: Using NGS technology, we found that the mutation-carrying rate of thalassemia genes was 11.89% in the Han population of childbearing age in Southwest China. Compared with the results of traditional PCR techniques, NGS detected an additional 0.91% (10/1,093) rare genetic variants. NGS technology should be utilized as the primary screening method for thalassemia carriers among Han nationality people of childbearing age in Southwest China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.