ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Colorectal cancer screening: A review of current knowledge and progress in research.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Direct access robotic excision (DARE): a novel colonoscopy-assisted approach for full-thickness resection of complex colonic polyps.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- PTPN23 Overexpression Is Associated with Reduced Proliferation and Tumor Growth in Murine Models of Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- HOXC9 transcriptionally activates NRP1 to promote cell malignant progression and immune evasion in colorectal cancer.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic Deprivation, Primary Care Physician Workload and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Across Italian Regions: An Ecological Spatial Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Characteristics and Effectiveness of Patient Navigation Programs on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Colonoscopy Uptake: A Systematic Review.AJPM focus · 2026Review
- TruncatingJournal of cancer prevention · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Potential of Exosomes in Colorectal Cancer: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Autophagy in cancer-associated fibroblasts: its role in gastrointestinal cancers.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Prediction of colorectal cancer liver metastasis through an MRI radiomic model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Chenodeoxycholic acid suppresses colorectal cancer by activating Farnesoid X receptor.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Deciphering Mutational Impacts on c-Src-HK2 Interaction in Colorectal Cancer Progression, and Identification of Potential Phytocompounds Inhibitors: A Molecular Simulation and Free Energy Calculation Approach.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Early detection of colorectal cancer using a hybrid model with enhanced image quality and optimized classification.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- HSSAM-Net: hyper-scale shifted aggregation network for precise colorectal polyp segmentation in endoscopic images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Therapeutic Colorectal Cancer Vaccines: Emerging Modalities and Translational Opportunities.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Research hotspots and emerging trends in targeted therapy for colorectal cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2023).Discover oncology · 2025Article
- PolyDeep Advance 1: Clinical Validation of a Computer-Aided Detection System for Colorectal Polyp Detection with a Second Observer Design.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Breast, Lung, and Colon Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Factors Influencing Women's Cancer Screening Behavior: A Case Study in South Eastern Iran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, being the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Despite the progress in screening, early diagnosis, and treatment, approximately 20%-25% of CRC patients still present with metastatic disease at the time of their initial diagnosis. Furthermore, the burden of disease is still expected to increase, especially in individuals younger than 50 years old, among whom early-onset CRC incidence has been increasing. Screening and early detection are pivotal to improve CRC-related outcomes. It is well established that CRC screening not only reduces incidence, but also decreases deaths from CRC. Diverse screening strategies have proven effective in decreasing both CRC incidence and mortality, though variations in efficacy have been reported across the literature. However, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal screening method, age intervals and periodicity. Moreover, adherence to CRC screening remains globally low. In recent years, emerging technologies, notably artificial intelligence, and non-invasive biomarkers, have been developed to overcome these barriers. However, controversy exists over the actual impact of some of the new discoveries on CRC-related outcomes and how to effectively integrate them into daily practice. In this review, we aim to cover the current evidence surrounding CRC screening. We will further critically assess novel approaches under investigation, in an effort to differentiate promising innovations from mere novelties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.