Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660572›Full record

ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2024

Understanding University Students' Perspectives towards Digital Tools for Mental Health Support: A Cross-country Study.

Ilaria Riboldi, Angela Calabrese, Susanna Piacenti, Chiara Alessandra Capogrosso, Susanna Lucini Paioni, Francesco Bartoli, Giuseppe Carrà, Jo Armes, Cath Taylor, Cristina Crocamo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ilaria RiboldiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza 20900, Italy.
Angela CalabreseDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza 20900, Italy.
Susanna PiacentiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza 20900, Italy.
Chiara Alessandra CapogrossoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza 20900, Italy.
Susanna Lucini PaioniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza 20900, Italy.
Francesco BartoliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza 20900, Italy.
Giuseppe CarràDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza 20900, Italy.
Jo ArmesFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health and Sciences, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Cath TaylorFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health and Sciences, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Cristina CrocamoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza 20900, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Organisational and individual barriers often prevent university students from seeking mental health support. Digital technologies are recognised as effective in managing psychological distress and as a source of health-related information, thus representing useful options to address mental health needs in terms of accessibility and cost-effectiveness. However, university students' experiences and perspectives towards such interventions are little known. Objectives: We thus aimed to expand the existing base of scientific knowledge, focusing on this special population. Methods: Data were from the qualitative component of "the CAMPUS study", longitudinally assessing the mental health of students at the University of Milano-Bicocca (Italy) and the University of Surrey (UK). We conducted in-depth interviews and thematically analysed the transcripts using the framework approach. Results: An explanatory model was derived from five themes identified across 33 interviews (15 for Italy, 18 for the UK). Students perceived that social media, apps, and podcasts could deliver relevant mental health content, ranging from primary to tertiary prevention. Wide availability and anonymity were perceived as advantages that make tools suitable for preventive interventions, to reduce mental health stigma, and as an extension of standard treatment. These goals can be hindered by disadvantages, namely lower efficacy compared to face-to-face contact, lack of personalisation, and problematic engagement. Individual and cultural specificities might influence awareness and perspectives on the use of digital technologies for mental health support. Conclusion: Although considering some specific features, digital tools could be a useful instrument to support the mental health needs of students. Since personal contact remains crucial, digital tools should be integrated with face-to-face interventions through a multi-modal approach.

Indexed as

Digital technologyMental healthQualitative researchStudentsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID38660572
PMCPMC11037510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.