Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660507›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on behavior science2024

Tutorial: Lessons Learned for Behavior Analysts from Data Scientists.

Leslie Neely, Sakiko Oyama, Qian Chen, Amina Qutub, Chen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on behavior science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leslie NeelyDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 West Cesar Chavez, San Antonio, TX 78207 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2171-3304
Sakiko OyamaDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 West Cesar Chavez, San Antonio, TX 78207 USA.
Qian ChenDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 West Cesar Chavez, San Antonio, TX 78207 USA.
Amina QutubDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 West Cesar Chavez, San Antonio, TX 78207 USA.
Chen ChenUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, FL USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Big data is a computing term used to refer to large and complex data sets, typically consisting of terabytes or more of diverse data that is produced rapidly. The analysis of such complex data sets requires advanced analysis techniques with the capacity to identify patterns and abstract meanings from the vast data. The field of data science combines computer science with mathematics/statistics and leverages artificial intelligence, in particular machine learning, to analyze big data. This field holds great promise for behavior analysis, where both clinical and research studies produce large volumes of diverse data at a rapid pace (i.e., big data). This article presents basic lessons for the behavior analytic researchers and clinicians regarding integration of data science into the field of behavior analysis. We provide guidance on how to collect, protect, and process the data, while highlighting the importance of collaborating with data scientists to select a proper machine learning model that aligns with the project goals and develop models with input from human experts. We hope this serves as a guide to support the behavior analysts interested in the field of data science to advance their practice or research, and helps them avoid some common pitfalls.

Indexed as

Behavior analysisBig dataData science

Identifiers

PMID38660507
PMCPMC11035514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.