Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660455›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024

Tachyphylaxis and reproducibility of desmopressin response in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A: implications for clinical practice.

L G R Romano, L M Schütte, R M van Hest, K Meijer, B A P Laros-van Gorkom, L Nieuwenhuizen, J Eikenboom, F C J I Heubel-Moenen, N Uitslager, M Coppens and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

L G R RomanoDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L M SchütteDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R M van HestDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K MeijerDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
B A P Laros-van GorkomDepartment of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
L NieuwenhuizenDepartment of Hematology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
J EikenboomDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
F C J I Heubel-MoenenDepartment of Hematology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
N UitslagerVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M CoppensDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K FijnvandraatDepartment of Paediatric Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M H E DriessensNetherlands Hemophilia Patient Society, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
S PolinderDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M H CnossenDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
F W G LeebeekDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R A A MathôtDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M J H A KruipDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
DAVID and SYMPHONY Consortium
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLDutch Cancer Society · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLSanquin · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Desmopressin is frequently used perioperatively in persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. However, increase in factor (F)VIII:C after desmopressin use is interindividually highly variable. Tachyphylaxis has only been reported in test setting for persons with hemophilia A, with a remaining response of approximately 70% after a second dose compared with that after a first dose. Objectives: To study tachyphylaxis of FVIII:C response after multiple administration(s) of desmopressin in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. Methods: We studied FVIII:C levels after desmopressin before (day 0 [D0]) and on days 1 (D1) and 2 (D2) after surgery in 26 patients of the DAVID and Little DAVID studies. We studied tachyphylaxis by comparing the responses at D1 and D2 with that at D0. We also assessed the reproducibility of the D0 response in comparison to an earlier performed desmopressin test. Results: The median absolute FVIII:C increase was 0.50 IU/mL (0.35-0.74; Conclusion: Tachyphylaxis in the surgical setting was considerably more pronounced than previously reported, with FVIII:C at D1 and D2 of 36% to 43% of the initial response. Our results may have important implications for monitoring repeated desmopressin treatment when used perioperatively.

Indexed as

desmopressinFVIII concentratehemophiliaperioperative periodtachyphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID38660455
PMCPMC11039391
OpenAlexW4392454194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.