Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660421›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Health data space nodes for privacy-preserving linkage of medical data to support collaborative secondary analyses.

Martin Baumgartner, Karl Kreiner, Aaron Lauschensky, Bernhard Jammerbund, Klaus Donsa, Dieter Hayn, Fabian Wiesmüller, Lea Demelius, Robert Modre-Osprian, Sabrina Neururer and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Martin BaumgartnerCenter for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Karl KreinerCenter for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Aaron LauschenskyCenter for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard JammerbundCenter for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Klaus DonsaCenter for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Dieter HaynCenter for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian WiesmüllerCenter for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Lea DemeliusInstitute of Interactive Systems and Data Science, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Robert Modre-Ospriantelbiomed Medizintechnik und IT Service GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Sabrina NeururerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Tyrolean Federal Institute for Integrated Care, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gerald SlamanigTirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sarah PrantlTirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.
Luca BrunelliDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard PfeiferDivision for Digital Health and Telemedicine, UMIT TIROL-Private University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.
Gerhard PölzlDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Günter SchreierCenter for Health and Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Austrian Institute of Technology · ATTirol Kliniken · ATGraz University of Technology · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATAustrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH · ATKnow Center Research GmbH (Austria) · ATUMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The potential for secondary use of health data to improve healthcare is currently not fully exploited. Health data is largely kept in isolated data silos and key infrastructure to aggregate these silos into standardized bodies of knowledge is underdeveloped. We describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a federated infrastructure to facilitate versatile secondary use of health data based on Health Data Space nodes. Materials and methods: Our proposed nodes are self-contained units that digest data through an extract-transform-load framework that pseudonymizes and links data with privacy-preserving record linkage and harmonizes into a common data model (OMOP CDM). To support collaborative analyses a multi-level feature store is also implemented. A feasibility experiment was conducted to test the infrastructures potential for machine learning operations and deployment of other apps (e.g., visualization). Nodes can be operated in a network at different levels of sharing according to the level of trust within the network. Results: In a proof-of-concept study, a privacy-preserving registry for heart failure patients has been implemented as a real-world showcase for Health Data Space nodes at the highest trust level, linking multiple data sources including (a) electronical medical records from hospitals, (b) patient data from a telemonitoring system, and (c) data from Austria's national register of deaths. The registry is deployed at the tirol kliniken, a hospital carrier in the Austrian state of Tyrol, and currently includes 5,004 patients, with over 2.9 million measurements, over 574,000 observations, more than 63,000 clinical free text notes, and in total over 5.2 million data points. Data curation and harmonization processes are executed semi-automatically at each individual node according to data sharing policies to ensure data sovereignty, scalability, and privacy. As a feasibility test, a natural language processing model for classification of clinical notes was deployed and tested. Discussion: The presented Health Data Space node infrastructure has proven to be practicable in a real-world implementation in a live and productive registry for heart failure. The present work was inspired by the European Health Data Space initiative and its spirit to interconnect health data silos for versatile secondary use of health data.

Indexed as

advanced analyticsartificial intelligencedata-driven healthcareEuropean Health Data Spaceinteroperabilitymachine learningprivacy-preservationrecord linkage

Identifiers

PMID38660421
PMCPMC11039786
OpenAlexW4394688673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.