Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660394›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2024

Shining a light on the road towards conducting principle-based co-production research in rehabilitation.

John A Bourke, Peter Bragge, Jo River, K Anne Sinnott Jerram, Mohit Arora, James W Middleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John A BourkeJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Peter BraggeMonash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jo RiverFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
K Anne Sinnott JerramJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Mohit AroraJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
James W MiddletonJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moving from participatory approaches incorporating co-design to co-production in health research involves a commitment to full engagement and partnership with people with lived experience through all stages of the research process-start to finish. However, despite the increased enthusiasm and proliferation of research that involves co-production, practice remains challenging, due in part to the lack of consensus on what constitutes co-production, a lack of guidance about the practical steps of applying this approach in respect to diverse research methods from multiple paradigms, and structural barriers within academia research landscape. To navigate the challenges in conducting co-produced research, it has been recommended that attention be paid to focusing and operationalising the underpinning principles and aspirations of co-production research, to aid translation into practice. In this article, we describe some fundamental principles essential to conducting co-production research (sharing power, relational resilience, and adopting a learning mindset) and provide tangible, practical strategies, and processes to engage these values. In doing so, we hope to support rehabilitation researchers who wish to engage in co-production to foster a more equitable, ethical, and impactful collaboration with people with lived experience and those involved in their circle of care.

Indexed as

capacity buildingco-production researchepistemic justicelived experience researchrehabilitation research designresearch partnership(s)

Identifiers

PMID38660394
PMCPMC11039800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.