ArticleNeurophotonics2024
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based diagnosis support system for distinguishing between mild and severe depression using machine learning approaches.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal disruption of prefrontal dynamics during affective association in depression: an fNIRS case-control study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Identifying neuroimaging biomarkers for anxiety in emerging adults using machine learning and functional near-infrared spectroscopy during resting-state.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Machine learning classification of fNIRS signals in patients with major depressive disorder and healthy controls.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Based Identification of Depressive Symptoms Among Students in a Chinese University Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Alpha psychiatry · 2025Article
- Neurovascular coupling abnormalities in first-episode drug-naïve major depressive disorder patients.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- fNIRS evidence of abnormal frontotemporal cortex activation and functional connectivity in depressed patients after stroke: neuromodulatory mechanisms from mild to moderate depression.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Explainable Multi-Layer Dynamic Ensemble Framework Optimized for Depression Detection and Severity Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Early diagnosis of depression is crucial for effective treatment. Our study utilizes functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and machine learning to accurately classify mild and severe depression, providing an objective auxiliary diagnostic tool for mental health workers. Aim: Develop prediction models to distinguish between severe and mild depression using fNIRS data. Approach: We collected the fNIRS data from 140 subjects and applied a complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with an adaptive noise-wavelet threshold combined denoising method (CEEMDAN-WPT) to remove noise during the verbal fluency task. The temporal features (TF) and correlation features (CF) from 18 prefrontal lobe channels of subjects were extracted as predictors. Using recursive feature elimination with cross-validation, we identified optimal TF or CF and examined their role in distinguishing between severe and mild depression. Machine learning algorithms were used for classification. Results: The combination of TF and CF as inputs for the prediction model yielded higher classification accuracy than using either TF or CF alone. Among the prediction models, the SVM-based model demonstrates excellent performance in nested cross-validation, achieving an accuracy rate of 92.8%. Conclusions: The proposed model can effectively distinguish mild depression from severe depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.