Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38660324›Full record

ArticleObstetric medicine2024

Management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in two Australian tertiary care maternity hospitals.

Amyna Helou, Kay Stewart, Johnson George

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amyna HelouCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-0711
Kay StewartCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Johnson GeorgeCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are common obstetric medical problems. Compliance with clinical guidelines and evidence from major trials has the potential to translate to significantly improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. The aims of this study were to prospectively review management of HDP in an Australian cohort in the context of the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australian and New Zealand (SOMANZ) guidelines and current evidence in published literature regarding management controversies. Methods: The management of 100 pregnant women with HDP and prescription for antihypertensive medication at two tertiary obstetric centres was prospectively reviewed in 2013. Compliance with SOMANZ guidelines, uptake of findings from the HYPITAT trial and the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial were assessed. Results: Sixty-eight women had chronic hypertension, while 32 had gestational hypertension. Management of HDP was mostly consistent with current SOMANZ guidelines and evidence from CHIPS and HYPITAT. Conclusion: Clinicians were practising according to the current SOMANZ guidelines, indicating vigilance on behalf of the treating team.

Indexed as

antihypertensive agentschronic hypertensiongestational hypertensionmaternity hospitalsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38660324
PMCPMC11037208
OpenAlexW4362584311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.